114 Comments

“Solarfest”. Hmm. Okay. Kinda says it all.

Expand full comment

I live in CT, despite most homes being heated by oil, you would be greatly surprised how many homes have not just one, but multiple fireplaces in the house. A HUGE number of the homes are very, very old. The housing that goes up today, like apartments and what not, yes, they will need energy. However, I would not discount NE's ability to redirect energy consumption away from oil and into wood at the drop of a hat.

I'll give a short story to demonstrate.

10ish years ago there was a terrible storm in which before the leaves finished falling, we had freezing rain/snow. As the rain froze to the leaves, it made the limbs so heavy that trees all across CT and Mass we falling left and right. On homes, in streets, on cars and on power lines. We were out of power for a week here. What did people do. There was no energy crisis. No one was out of oil to heat homes. What happened. There was like a regional effect by everyone to clean this wood up. Why? Because everyone wanted to get their hands on the firewood. See, state workers were coming with chainsaws, slicing up the trees on the road and would simply push it to the side and onto some persons lawn. Within hours that tree would be GONE! Like vultures, New England residents would swoop in with pick-ups, trucks...cars,...everything. Everyone wanted to get free firewood because free is better than paying for oil! The effort to get the biggest tree was so great, I even had a full cord worth of uncut log stolen off my yard after dragging it 30 miles back to my house. An impressively heavy thing to steal if you think about it.

My point being is that the moment energy prices become a real problem in the NE,...not a distant one, but a real issue that the residents are aware of, you would instantly see a massive shift to burning firewood. We burn wood; we got jackets, wood splitters, axes and chainsaws for days. Believe me, there is no short supply of trees around here and everyone that isn't in the metro of Boston/Springfield/Hartford...grew up carrying firewood for campfires and the house alike. Wood Spiders? Who hasn't seen one scurry across your hand grabbing wood in the winter. What to do what to do... campfire and alcohol of course.

IMO, the real issue around here is in the summer. AC usage is something there is no way around. While winter is cold, New England is used to it. We get hot more easily than someone from Florida simply because of climate acclimation. We're used to the cold nine months of the year, so when the summer months hit, the AC turns on and runs 24.7. I agree with SolarFest Dave's point that your "comfort zone" level is set WAYYYY too high. If I had my house set like that in the winter, I would literally not be able to do anything in the home unless I was only wearing only what God gave me. A comfort zone between 64 and 75 is more reasonable. People here are aware of energy costs and usually opt to turn the heat down and wear socks, not work overtime so the house can be empty and 90 degrees.

Hope that helps perhaps give a little perspective of a native.

-Ice

Expand full comment

First of all, I have been a New Englander for the past 54 years of my life (since the age of 6).

There is an awful lot of either misleading information - or simply ignored facts in this opinion piece:

Misleading info: the range given for the "thermal comfort" zone (67 to 82F) is absolutely ABSURD!! Well insulated and air sealed homes are well known to be comfortable in the mid 60sF and below. Heating one's home to 80F (or above) is only done by the elderly (and low-income folks in public housing because we have not invested in heating system controls in decades since these buildings were erected, many in the 1940s and 1950s and would be extremely uncomfortable to the average New Englander (as well as being highly wasteful, which no proud New Englander will tolerate. The desired humidty range is more accurate, though I would narrow it to 40 to 50% - and also note that our homes are MUCH too dry, leading to less comfort as well as less healthy places to live (low humidity dries out the sinuses and makes catching colds and flus more likely.

By drastically overstating the desired indoor temperature of our homes, the Doomsberg folks have recommended indoor temperature settings that, at the extreme of 82F, would result in an increase of about 90% in our energy consumption to heat our homes (every 10F of temperature reduction would will save about 30% on fuel consumption).

Ignored facts: all the talk about building new gas pipelines COMPLETELY ignores the dire reports from the IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change) about how we MUST reduce fossil fuel consumption MUCH more rapidly than we realized. Continuing to build out fossil fuel infrastructure is climate suicide!

How must we proceed? We've got to practice much more conservation and energy efficiency, our two greatest resources which 99% of the 'experts' have NO IDEA about the potential of (see what the Rocky Mountain Institute is doing - REAL projects in the REAL world www.rmi.org). We have to look to the big picture of leaving the planet healthy and productive for our children - and, yes, that likely means some 'sacrifice' as we learn to change our over-consumptive lifestyles.

I put the word 'sacrifice' in quotes above because I cannot call it sacrifice but rather relatively minor inconvenience. Think of it this way: when the Greatest Generation stormed the beaches at Normandy in June of 1944, knowing that their death was an all too likely possibility, THAT was sacrifice.

We have become embarrassingly spoiled and self centered by our lack of being challenged in way too long...God help us.

Expand full comment

Reminds me of this old joke...

A fellow was stuck on his rooftop in a flood. He was praying to God for help.

Soon a man in a rowboat came by and the fellow shouted to the man on the roof, “Jump in, I can save you.”

The stranded fellow shouted back, “No, it’s OK, I’m praying to God and he is going to save me.”

So the rowboat went on.

Then a motorboat came by. “The fellow in the motorboat shouted, “Jump in, I can save you.”

To this the stranded man said, “No thanks, I’m praying to God and he is going to save me. I have faith.”

So the motorboat went on.

Then a helicopter came by and the pilot shouted down, “Grab this rope and I will lift you to safety.”

To this the stranded man again replied, “No thanks, I’m praying to God and he is going to save me. I have faith.”

So the helicopter reluctantly flew away.

Soon the water rose above the rooftop and the man drowned. He went to Heaven. He finally got his chance to discuss this whole situation with God, at which point he exclaimed, “I had faith in you but you didn’t save me, you let me drown. I don’t understand why!”

To this God replied, “I sent you a rowboat and a motorboat and a helicopter, what more did you expect?”

Expand full comment

Great piece. Need to have interview with Vaclav Smil about how the real world works. His book "Numbers Don't Lie" is awesome. Only thing missing is time component (that is time to build a pipeline from WV to Northeast even with no permitting delays). Everyone is used to instant stuff but this works only in the (now crumbling) Metaverse.

Expand full comment

I had the misfortune of having to show the Al Gore film to a jr hi science class back around 2002. I was a sub teacher at the time and the primary teacher didn't appreciate that I told the classes that the film appeared to be closer to propaganda than scientific fact. I wasn't asked back. Since then, I am convinced that the "Greenies" have become even more divorced from the realities of physics. This piece confirms that.

Expand full comment

Enjoy your work. So take these questions for what they are... questions. 1) NE energy demand has been in secular decline... does that mean that there is excess capacity? Or is capacity falling faster? 2) peak energy demand is in the summer... is there actually a potential for shortfalls in the winter? 3) The population lives in the coast... wouldn't you expect infra to be close to the population?. 4) Do you have any work that shows supply and demand and works through what it would take create a shortfall. 5) It will happen eventually... you will post a piece, and get feedback and find out that the central point of the article is wrong... how will you deal with it. I am not a grid expert. I don't know that you wrong here or even if my questions are great questions. But I will gain a lot more confidence in the work when the time comes and we get to see in real time how you deal with publishing a piece that proves to be off base.

Expand full comment

No posts since I joined,. I'll try to not take it personally. 🤔

Expand full comment

Funny how the bird is green. Just a coincidence, I sure.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/1qMMhg3zpQ0K/

Expand full comment

I say bring on the crises and then watch as the media and our elites propagandize the people to think that it wasn't poor investment in renewables that was the cause. then they will double down again and then get wiped out. We will see who the smart politicians are that wake up to this and use the crises to take power (literally). The only other way this could go is that the propaganda works and no matter if they don't have power, people will literally suck it up and keep believing in the green propaganda. We will see which way it goes. I wish I could come up with a way to financially benefit from the green idiots and their plans.

Expand full comment

New Hampshire has been trying to bring in more LNG pipelines for year. Most people in the State rely on Propane or Heating Oil delivery by trucks. The problem is New York will not allow pipelines to transit New York State or it's nearby off shore waters. Massachusetts and Vermont hold a similar position. So, no new pipelines can reach New Hampshire (or Maine). If New England only relied on LNG pipeline capacity, it would run out of gas to power its plants. So, it has to import. New Hampshire has its own problems, though. It also recently voted to block a large hydroelectric line from Canada called "Northern Pass".

Expand full comment
Jan 3, 2022·edited Jan 3, 2022

The rejectionists of the Hydro Quebec line through Maine did a great job of playing on Maine voters’ resentment toward Massachusetts. “…and the power will be going to Massachusetts!!” That was the tag line of every commercial opposing the carbon-free hydro power line. And that’s fine, I guess, because power blackouts and climate change effects will stay within the borders of Massachusetts, right?

Expand full comment

Finally....someone else in this world owns a calculator...I thought I was all alone...keep up the great work guys...

Expand full comment

Democracy can be a serious impediment to common sense infrastructure projects. The fact the China leads the world in nuclear, wind, and solar power technologies is one sign that sometimes, people with dogmatic environmentalist views should be silenced by force.

Expand full comment

It is all about dumb ass politicians and regulators. Make no mistake about it, this is exactly what they want. They won't be happy until the entire United States is destroyed.

Expand full comment

Good, let them all freeze to death while they vote Democrat.

Expand full comment